HB 272 (1993): requiring a balanced state budget.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“HB 272 (1993): requiring a balanced state budget.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/1993/hb272. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). HB 272 (1993): requiring a balanced state budget. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/1993/hb272
Chicago
Granite Record. “HB 272 (1993): requiring a balanced state budget.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/1993/hb272.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-1993-hb272, title = {HB 272 (1993): requiring a balanced state budget.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/1993/hb272}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

HB 272 (1993)

requiring a balanced state budget.

  • Status: Killed
  • Term: 1993-1994
  • House committee: Appropriations
  • Subject: Miscellaneous

The Story

It was introduced on January 6, 1993 and referred to the House Appropriations committee. The committee held a public hearing on January 13, 1993. The majority of the committee recommended that the House kill it by a vote of 18–3. On February 4, 1993 the House voted to kill it on a voice vote.

Sponsors

  • Rep. D. Young (Ches 2) (prime sponsor)
  • Rep. F. Riley (Hills 44)
  • Rep. D. Welch (Rock 18)

Hearings and Sessions

  • January 13, 1993, 11:30 AM: hearing, House Appropriations, RM100,SH

Votes

  • February 4, 1993, House: Inexpedient to Legislate — voice vote, passed

The Docket

  • January 6, 1993: INTRODUCED AND REF TO APPROP; HJ8,P112
  • January 13, 1993: HEARING JAN13 11:30 RM100,SH FOR: APPROP
  • January 27, 1993: MAJ REPORT ITL FOR FEB04 (VOTE 18-3)
  • February 4, 1993: ITL REPORT ADOPTED VV; HJ18,P329

Laws It Would Change

Related Bills

  • SB 163-FN-LOCAL (1994): requiring a balanced state budget and relative to the return of general fund surpluses to the cities and towns.

From the General Court