SB 338 (1992): establishing the crime of official abuse.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“SB 338 (1992): establishing the crime of official abuse.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/1992/sb338. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). SB 338 (1992): establishing the crime of official abuse. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/1992/sb338
Chicago
Granite Record. “SB 338 (1992): establishing the crime of official abuse.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/1992/sb338.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-1992-sb338, title = {SB 338 (1992): establishing the crime of official abuse.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/1992/sb338}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

SB 338 (1992)

establishing the crime of official abuse.

  • Status: Killed
  • Term: 1991-1992
  • Senate committee: Judiciary
  • Subject: Crimes, Criminal Procedure and Corrections

The Story

It was introduced on January 8, 1992 and referred to the Senate Judiciary committee. The committee held a public hearing on January 22, 1992. The committee recommended that the Senate kill it. On February 6, 1992 the Senate voted to lay it on the table on a voice vote. On May 7, 1992 the Senate voted to kill it, on a motion by Sen. Hough.

Sponsors

  • Sen. Roberge (SD9) (prime sponsor)

Hearings and Sessions

  • January 22, 1992, 10:45 AM: hearing, Senate Judiciary, RM103,LOB

Votes

  • February 6, 1992, Senate: Laid on Table — voice vote, passed

The Docket

  • January 8, 1992: INTRODUCED AND REF TO JUDICIARY
  • January 22, 1992: HEARING JAN22 10:45 RM103,LOB FOR: JUDICIARY
  • February 5, 1992: COMM REPORT ITL FEB06
  • February 6, 1992: LAID ON THE TABLE, SEN HEATH MA VV; SJ3,P43
  • May 7, 1992: SEN HOUGH MOVED (ALL BILLS LOT) ITL, MA VV; SJ22,P699

Laws It Would Change

From the General Court