HB 524-FN (1992): to allow municipalities to determine the net income requirements under the optional adjusted elderly property tax exemption.
Cite this page
Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.
- MLA
- “HB 524-FN (1992): to allow municipalities to determine the net income requirements under the optional adjusted elderly property tax exemption.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/1992/hb524. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
- APA
- Granite Record. (n.d.). HB 524-FN (1992): to allow municipalities to determine the net income requirements under the optional adjusted elderly property tax exemption. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/1992/hb524
- Chicago
- Granite Record. “HB 524-FN (1992): to allow municipalities to determine the net income requirements under the optional adjusted elderly property tax exemption.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/1992/hb524.
- BibTeX
@misc{bill-1992-hb524, title = {HB 524-FN (1992): to allow municipalities to determine the net income requirements under the optional adjusted elderly property tax exemption.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/1992/hb524}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }
HB 524-FN (1992)
to allow municipalities to determine the net income requirements under the optional adjusted elderly property tax exemption.
- Status: Killed
- Term: 1991-1992
- House committee: Municipal and County Government
- Subject: Taxes - Local
The Story
It was introduced on February 5, 1991 and referred to the House Municipal and County Government committee. The committee held a public hearing on February 25, 1991. The majority of the committee recommended that the House send it back to committee unanimously, 11–0, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. On March 19, 1991 the bill was referred to the Municipal and County Government committee. The majority of the committee recommended that the House kill it by a vote of 13–2. On January 9, 1992 the House adopted “Special Order to 01/14/1992”. On January 14, 1992 the House voted to kill it on a voice vote.
Sponsors
- Rep. Holmes (Merr 13) (prime sponsor)
- Rep. Holden (Hills 9)
- Rep. Stio (Merr 5)
- Rep. Tarpley (Hills 9)
Hearings and Sessions
- February 25, 1991, 1:00 PM: hearing, House Municipal and County Government, RM211,LOB
Votes
- January 14, 1992, House: Inexpedient to Legislate — voice vote, passed
The Docket
- February 5, 1991: INTRODUCED AND REF TO MUN & CNTY GOVT; HJ23,P294
- February 11, 1991: IN SEAT POCKET ON FEB12 DUE ON MAR14
- February 19, 1991: ==CANCELLED==HEARING FEB19 01:00 RM211,LOB FOR: MUN & CNTY GOV
- February 25, 1991: RESCHEDULED HEARING FEB25 01:00 RM211,LOB FOR: M&CG
- March 11, 1991: MAJ REPORT RE-REF FOR MAR19 (VOTE 11-0;CC)
- March 19, 1991: RE-REFERRED TO MUN & CNTY GOVT; HJ53A,P1118
- July 1, 1991: [RE-REF SUBCOM: REPS MIDDLETON, BARNES & E. CLARK]
- September 19, 1991: RE-REF MAJ REPORT ITL FOR 1992, ON 01/09/92 (VOTE 13-2)
- January 9, 1992: SPECIAL ORDER TO 01/14/92 (JAN09 CALENDAR MOVED DUE TO WEATHER)
- January 14, 1992: ITL REPORT ADOPTED VV; HJ13,P438