HB 1496-FN-LOCAL (1992): relative to the funding methodology of the retirement system.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA: “HB 1496-FN-LOCAL (1992): relative to the funding methodology of the retirement system.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/1992/hb1496. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA: Granite Record. (n.d.). HB 1496-FN-LOCAL (1992): relative to the funding methodology of the retirement system. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/1992/hb1496
Chicago: Granite Record. “HB 1496-FN-LOCAL (1992): relative to the funding methodology of the retirement system.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/1992/hb1496.
BibTeX: @misc{bill-1992-hb1496, title = {HB 1496-FN-LOCAL (1992): relative to the funding methodology of the retirement system.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/1992/hb1496}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

HB 1496-FN-LOCAL (1992)

relative to the funding methodology of the retirement system.

Status: Killed
Term: 1991-1992
House committee: Executive Departments and Administration
Senate committee: Insurance
Subject: Retirement

The Story

It was introduced on January 8, 1992 and referred to the House Executive Departments and Administration committee. The majority recommended that the House pass it with changes, and the minority recommended that the House pass it with changes, by a vote of 10–8. On February 20, 1992 the House voted to pass it with changes on a voice vote, then referred it on to the House Appropriations committee. On February 20, 1992 the House adopted “Suspend Rules for hearing”, on a motion by Rep. Hager. The committee held a public hearing on February 21, 1992. The majority of the committee recommended that the House pass it by a vote of 16–3. On March 3, 1992 the House voted to pass it on a voice vote. It crossed to the Senate on March 4, 1992 and was referred to the Senate Insurance committee. The committee held a public hearing on March 25, 1992. The committee recommended that the Senate kill it. On April 21, 1992 the Senate voted to kill it on a voice vote.

Hearings and Sessions

January 29, 1992, 9:30 AM: hearing, House Executive Departments and Administration, REPS' HALL
February 21, 1992, 9:30 AM: hearing, House Appropriations, RM100,ST HOUSE
March 25, 1992, 10:00 AM: hearing, Senate Insurance, RM101,LOB

Votes

February 20, 1992, House: Ought to Pass with Amendment — voice vote, passed
March 3, 1992, House: Ought to Pass — voice vote, passed
April 21, 1992, Senate: Inexpedient to Legislate — voice vote, passed

The Docket

January 8, 1992: INTRODUCED AND REF TO EXEC DEPTS & ADMIN
January 8, 1992: IN SEAT POCKET ON 01/08/92 DUE ON 02/05/92
January 14, 1992: <NOTE ROOM CHANGE> HEARING JAN29 09:30 REPS' HALL FOR: ED&A
January 24, 1992: REPS WARD & C. BROWN PROP AM; HC17,P528
February 5, 1992: EXTENSION GRANTED TO FEB19, REP KIDDER MA; HJ29,P740
February 17, 1992: MAJ REPORT OTP/AM FOR FEB20 (VOTE 10-8)
February 17, 1992: MIN REPORT OTP/AM
February 19, 1992: PROP MAJ AM; HC36,P894-895
February 19, 1992: PROP MIN AM (NEW TITLE); HC36,P895-896
February 20, 1992: REP MCGOVERN SUBST MIN REPORT, MA RC(181-165); MIN AM, AA RC(199-147); PASSED WITH AM AND REF TO APPROP VV; HJ40,P958-965
February 20, 1992: REP HAGER SUSP RULES FOR HEARING, MA 2/3VV; HJ40,P969
February 21, 1992: HEARING FEB21 09:30 RM100,ST HOUSE FOR: APPROP
February 24, 1992: MAJ APPROP REPORT OTP FOR MAR03 (VOTE 16-3)
March 3, 1992: PASSED VV; HJ52,P1325 + 1380
March 4, 1992: INTRODUCED AND REF TO INSURANCE
March 25, 1992: HEARING MAR25 10:00 RM101,LOB FOR: INSURANCE
April 20, 1992: COMM REPORT ITL APR21
April 21, 1992: ITL REPORT ADOPTED VV; SJ19,P451-452

Laws It Would Change

RSA 100-A:16

Related Bills

SB 303 (1992): establishing a committee to study the various options available to fund and deliver medical benefits for state employees and relative to the funding methodology of the retirement system.