HB 1349 (1992): requiring certain disclosure during recruitment by multi-level or network marketing corporations.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“HB 1349 (1992): requiring certain disclosure during recruitment by multi-level or network marketing corporations.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/1992/hb1349. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). HB 1349 (1992): requiring certain disclosure during recruitment by multi-level or network marketing corporations. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/1992/hb1349
Chicago
Granite Record. “HB 1349 (1992): requiring certain disclosure during recruitment by multi-level or network marketing corporations.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/1992/hb1349.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-1992-hb1349, title = {HB 1349 (1992): requiring certain disclosure during recruitment by multi-level or network marketing corporations.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/1992/hb1349}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

HB 1349 (1992)

requiring certain disclosure during recruitment by multi-level or network marketing corporations.

  • Status: Referred for interim study
  • Term: 1991-1992
  • House committee: Commerce, Small Business and Consumer Affairs
  • Subject: Miscellaneous

The Story

It was introduced on January 8, 1992 and referred to the House Commerce, Small Business and Consumer Affairs committee. The committee held a public hearing on January 29, 1992. The majority of the committee recommended that the House study it after the session ends by a vote of 14–1, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. On February 27, 1992 the House voted to study it after the session ends. The committee met in executive session on October 28, 1992 to vote on its recommendation. The committee reported back on its interim study of the bill: “Inexpedient to Legislate”, by a vote of 12 to 0.

Sponsors

  • Rep. Hurst (Rock 17) (prime sponsor)
  • Rep. Fields (Hills 13)
  • Rep. Nehring (Straf 1)
  • Rep. Spencer (Straf 4)

Hearings and Sessions

  • January 29, 1992, 10:30 AM: hearing, House Commerce, Small Business and Consumer Affairs, RM207,LOB
  • October 21, 1992, 10:00 AM: hearing, House Commerce, Small Business and Consumer Affairs, RM206,LOB
  • October 28, 1992, 10:00 AM: executive session, House Commerce, Small Business and Consumer Affairs, RM207,LOB

The Docket

  • January 8, 1992: INTRODUCED AND REF TO COMMERCE
  • January 8, 1992: IN SEAT POCKET ON 01/08/92 DUE ON 02/26/92
  • January 29, 1992: HEARING JAN29 10:30 RM207,LOB FOR: COMMERCE
  • February 20, 1992: MAJ REPORT REF FOR STUDY FOR FEB27 (VOTE 14-1;CC)
  • February 27, 1992: REFERRED TO COMMERCE FOR INTERIM STUDY; HJ46,P1139
  • October 13, 1992: SUBCOM PUB HEARING OCT 21 10:00 RM206,LOB FOR: COMMERCE
  • October 28, 1992: INT STUDY EXEC SESSION OCT28 10:00 RM207,LOB FOR: COMM
  • October 28, 1992: INT STUDY REPORT (ITL) FILED (VOTE 12-0)

From the General Court