HB 1299-FN (1992): providing that beverage wholesale distributor's and beverage manufacturer's fees shall not be reduced if beverage container mandatory deposit legislation is enacted.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“HB 1299-FN (1992): providing that beverage wholesale distributor's and beverage manufacturer's fees shall not be reduced if beverage container mandatory deposit legislation is enacted.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/1992/hb1299. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). HB 1299-FN (1992): providing that beverage wholesale distributor's and beverage manufacturer's fees shall not be reduced if beverage container mandatory deposit legislation is enacted. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/1992/hb1299
Chicago
Granite Record. “HB 1299-FN (1992): providing that beverage wholesale distributor's and beverage manufacturer's fees shall not be reduced if beverage container mandatory deposit legislation is enacted.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/1992/hb1299.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-1992-hb1299, title = {HB 1299-FN (1992): providing that beverage wholesale distributor's and beverage manufacturer's fees shall not be reduced if beverage container mandatory deposit legislation is enacted.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/1992/hb1299}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

HB 1299-FN (1992)

providing that beverage wholesale distributor's and beverage manufacturer's fees shall not be reduced if beverage container mandatory deposit legislation is enacted.

  • Status: Killed
  • Term: 1991-1992
  • House committee: Regulated Revenues
  • Subject: Liquor and Beer

The Story

The committee held a public hearing on January 7, 1992. It was introduced on January 8, 1992 and referred to the House Regulated Revenues committee. The majority of the committee recommended that the House kill it unanimously, 14–0, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. The bill was taken off the consent calendar on February 6, 1992. On February 6, 1992 the House voted to kill it on a voice vote.

Sponsors

  • Rep. B. Hall (Hills 16) (prime sponsor)

Hearings and Sessions

  • January 7, 1992, 1:30 PM: hearing, House Regulated Revenues, RM308,LOB

Votes

  • February 6, 1992, House: Inexpedient to Legislate — voice vote, passed

The Docket

  • January 7, 1992: HEARING JAN07 01:30 RM308,LOB FOR: REG REV
  • January 8, 1992: INTRODUCED AND REF TO REG REV
  • January 8, 1992: IN SEAT POCKET ON 01/08/92 DUE ON 02/05/92
  • January 29, 1992: MAJ REPORT ITL FOR FEB06 (VOTE 14-0;CC)
  • February 6, 1992: REMOVED FROM CONS CAL, REQ REP B. HALL; HJ29,P743
  • February 6, 1992: REP B. HALL SUBST OTP, ML DIV(88-243); ITL REPORT ADOPTED VV; HJ29,P759

Laws It Would Change

From the General Court