HB 235-FN (1991): relative to mandatory risk sharing plans.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“HB 235-FN (1991): relative to mandatory risk sharing plans.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/1991/hb235. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). HB 235-FN (1991): relative to mandatory risk sharing plans. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/1991/hb235
Chicago
Granite Record. “HB 235-FN (1991): relative to mandatory risk sharing plans.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/1991/hb235.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-1991-hb235, title = {HB 235-FN (1991): relative to mandatory risk sharing plans.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/1991/hb235}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

HB 235-FN (1991)

relative to mandatory risk sharing plans.

  • Status: Killed
  • Term: 1991-1992
  • House committee: Commerce, Small Business and Consumer Affairs
  • Subject: Miscellaneous

The Story

It was introduced on January 3, 1991 and referred to the House Commerce, Small Business and Consumer Affairs committee. The committee held a public hearing on January 29, 1991. The majority of the committee recommended that the House kill it unanimously, 16–0, and the report was placed on the consent calendar. On March 5, 1991 the House voted to kill it.

Sponsors

  • Rep. Braiterman (Merr 3) (prime sponsor)

Hearings and Sessions

  • January 29, 1991, 11:00 AM: hearing, House Commerce, Small Business and Consumer Affairs, RM207,LOB

The Docket

  • January 3, 1991: INTRODUCED AND REF TO COMMERCE; HJ11,P91
  • January 23, 1991: IN SEAT POCKET ON JAN23 DUE ON FEB27
  • January 29, 1991: HEARING JAN29 11:00 RM207,LOB FOR: COMMERCE
  • February 20, 1991: MAJ REPORT ITL FOR MAR05 (VOTE 16-0;CC)
  • March 5, 1991: ITL REPORT ADOPTED; HJ39,P706

Laws It Would Change

Related Bills

From the General Court