HB 102 (1991): relative to a state budget spending cap.

Cite this page

Granite Record indexes the General Court’s record; it is not that record. Where a citation allows only one source, cite the General Court — every page here links to what it is drawn from. The date below is the day the page was read.

MLA
“HB 102 (1991): relative to a state budget spending cap.” Granite Record, https://graniterecord.org/bill/1991/hb102. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026.
APA
Granite Record. (n.d.). HB 102 (1991): relative to a state budget spending cap. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2026, from https://graniterecord.org/bill/1991/hb102
Chicago
Granite Record. “HB 102 (1991): relative to a state budget spending cap.” Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. https://graniterecord.org/bill/1991/hb102.
BibTeX
@misc{bill-1991-hb102, title = {HB 102 (1991): relative to a state budget spending cap.}, howpublished = {Granite Record}, url = {https://graniterecord.org/bill/1991/hb102}, note = {Accessed 24 Oct. 2026} }

HB 102 (1991)

relative to a state budget spending cap.

  • Status: Killed
  • Term: 1991-1992
  • House committee: Appropriations
  • Subject: Miscellaneous

The Story

It was introduced on January 3, 1991 and referred to the House Appropriations committee. The committee held a public hearing on January 24, 1991. The majority of the committee recommended that the House kill it by a vote of 18–1. On February 5, 1991 the House voted to kill it on a voice vote.

Sponsors

  • Rep. Buco (Rock 20) (prime sponsor)
  • Rep. Ouellette (Hills 48)
  • Rep. A. Smith (Rock 20)
  • Rep. Cooke (Rock 20)
  • Rep. Klemm (Rock 22)

Hearings and Sessions

  • January 24, 1991, 9:30 AM: hearing, House Appropriations, RM100,SH

Votes

  • February 5, 1991, House: Inexpedient to Legislate — voice vote, passed

The Docket

  • January 3, 1991: INTRODUCED AND REF TO APPROPRIATIONS; HJ10, P84
  • January 24, 1991: HEARING JAN24 09:30 RM100,SH FOR: APPROPRIATIONS
  • January 29, 1991: MAJ REPORT ITL FOR FEB05 (VOTE 18-1)
  • February 5, 1991: ITL REPORT ADOPTED VV; HJ18,P181-182

Laws It Would Change

From the General Court