All bills

HB 1812-FN

requiring periodic evaluation of mental health access adequacy by an independent third party.

Filed 2026 · Killed · Commerce and Consumer Affairs · Public and Mental Health

Official record at gencourt.state.nh.us ↗

Open this bill in the searchable view →  ·  Follow this bill by RSS

On the record

Quoted from the General Court bill status page, not worked out from the docket.

StatusHOUSE
In the HouseINEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE
Introduced1/7/2026
Floor date2/19/2026
LSR number2975
Local government impactno
Committee codeH43

Bill text (PDF) ↗

Where it stands

House: INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE

Every floor vote on this bill was a voice or division vote, so there is no record of how individual legislators voted.

A bill goes on the consent calendar when the committee vote was unanimous or nearly so, and any members who dissented did not object to placing it there. It then passes without floor debate. Ten members may file a petition to pull a bill off the consent calendar and have it debated and voted on separately.

Sponsors

Gregg, Alicia(D) Hills 7, Booras, Efstathia(D) Hills 8, Fenton, Donovan(D) Ches 10, Nelson, Jodi(R) Rock 13, Rice, Kimberly(R) Hills 38
Prime sponsor in bold. From the General Court sponsor file.

What happened

Every action recorded in the official docket, in order. Each line ends with the journal or calendar that recorded it; where we have the document, that citation links to it.

Votes

Roll call tallies and individual votes from the General Court roll call files. Presiding, excused and absent are shown separately: one member presides over each House roll call and does not vote except to break a tie.

Inexpedient to Legislate

February 19, 2026 · House · None–None, adopted

Decided on a voice vote. Only the outcome was recorded — there is no count of how any member voted.

Committee reports

Reproduced from the House Calendar in the committee’s own words.

Committee — INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE

Rep. Julie Miles

The committee recognizes the importance of ensuring timely and adequate access to mental health services and appreciates the intent of the sponsors to improve accountability and transparency in this area. After review, the committee determined that this bill is duplicative and unnecessarily complex in light of existing statutes and multiple mental health–related bills currently under consideration. The committee also notes that the legislature has recently enacted reforms to expedite the licensing process for mental health professionals, directly addressing access and workforce capacity concerns that this bill seeks to evaluate. Given the number of active initiatives already focused on improving mental health access, adding a separate, third-party evaluation framework risks creating confusion, overlapping oversight, and inconsistent standards without a clear benefit to patients or providers. The committee believes continued progress is best achieved by allowing recently enacted and pending reforms to be implemented and evaluated before imposing additional reporting and evaluation requirements. Vote 16-0.

Hearings and recordings

Recordings are the General Court’s own, on YouTube. Start times are estimates unless stated otherwise, and the player opens early.

Page generated 2026-09-03 from data published by the New Hampshire General Court. Granite Record is an independent project, not affiliated with the General Court. The official record always takes precedence. Corrections: [email protected]