All bills

HB 1801-FN

relative to causes of action for wrongful detention, drug forfeiture proceedings, the regulation of law enforcement officers, and the offense of unsworn falsification.

Filed 2026 · Killed · Judiciary · Police

Official record at gencourt.state.nh.us ↗

Open this bill in the searchable view →  ·  Follow this bill by RSS

On the record

Quoted from the General Court bill status page, not worked out from the docket.

StatusHOUSE
In the HouseINEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE
Introduced1/7/2026
Floor date3/5/2026
LSR number3046
Local government impactno
Committee codeH10

Bill text (PDF) ↗

Where it stands

House: INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE

Every floor vote on this bill was a voice or division vote, so there is no record of how individual legislators voted.

A bill goes on the consent calendar when the committee vote was unanimous or nearly so, and any members who dissented did not object to placing it there. It then passes without floor debate. Ten members may file a petition to pull a bill off the consent calendar and have it debated and voted on separately.

Sponsors

Read, Ellen(D) Rock 10, Ankarberg, Aidan(I) Straf 7, Beaulier, Calvin(R) Graf 1, Mannion, Tom(R) Hills 1, McGuire, Dan(R) Merr 14
Prime sponsor in bold. From the General Court sponsor file.

What happened

Every action recorded in the official docket, in order. Each line ends with the journal or calendar that recorded it; where we have the document, that citation links to it.

Votes

Roll call tallies and individual votes from the General Court roll call files. Presiding, excused and absent are shown separately: one member presides over each House roll call and does not vote except to break a tie.

Inexpedient to Legislate

March 5, 2026 · House · None–None, adopted

Decided on a voice vote. Only the outcome was recorded — there is no count of how any member voted.

Committee reports

Reproduced from the House Calendar in the committee’s own words.

Committee — INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE

Rep. Dennis Mannion

This bill contains three unrelated sections: one dealing with wrongful detention by law enforcement; another making major changes to the drug forfeiture law; and a third making it an offense for a law enforcement officer to knowingly provide false information in a report. While the intent of the first and third purposes to enhance law enforcement accountability is well-meaning, it is largely duplicative of existing mechanisms — including federal claims, state tort remedies, internal affairs processes, the Conduct Review Committee, the AG’s Public Integrity Unit, and current criminal statutes on falsification (RSA 641:3 and 641:7). And the drug forfeiture provisions are similar to proposals that have been rejected by the legislature before. The proposed changes could create significant unintended consequences. In summary, the bill imposes substantial new administrative and litigation burdens without meaningfully advancing forfeiture proceeding fairness, public safety or officer accountability beyond what current law and oversight already provide. Vote 18-0.

Hearings and recordings

Recordings are the General Court’s own, on YouTube. Start times are estimates unless stated otherwise, and the player opens early.

Page generated 2026-09-03 from data published by the New Hampshire General Court. Granite Record is an independent project, not affiliated with the General Court. The official record always takes precedence. Corrections: [email protected]