All bills

HB 1752-FN

requiring the creation of a ticket to follow timber through the harvesting and production process to establish a chain of custody.

Filed 2026 · Died on the table · Resources, Recreation and Development · Agriculture

Official record at gencourt.state.nh.us ↗

Open this bill in the searchable view →  ·  Follow this bill by RSS

On the record

Quoted from the General Court bill status page, not worked out from the docket.

StatusHOUSE
In the HouseDIED ON THE TABLE
Introduced1/7/2026
Floor date2/19/2026
LSR number2953
Local government impactno
Committee codeH22

Bill text (PDF) ↗

Where it stands

House: DIED ON THE TABLE

Every floor vote on this bill was a voice or division vote, so there is no record of how individual legislators voted.

The bill was set aside during the session and never taken back up, so it died when the session ended.

Sponsors

Howard, Heath(D) Straf 4, Bixby, Peter(D) Straf 13, Nagel, David(D) Belk 6
Prime sponsor in bold. From the General Court sponsor file.

What happened

Every action recorded in the official docket, in order. Each line ends with the journal or calendar that recorded it; where we have the document, that citation links to it.

Votes

Roll call tallies and individual votes from the General Court roll call files. Presiding, excused and absent are shown separately: one member presides over each House roll call and does not vote except to break a tie.

Lay HB1752 on Table (Rep. Vose)

February 19, 2026 · House · 185–155, adopted

Decided on a division vote. Only the outcome was recorded — there is no count of how any member voted.

Committee reports

Reproduced from the House Calendar in the committee’s own words.

Majority — OUGHT TO PASS WITH AMENDMENT

Rep. Arnold Davis

This bill aims to establish a chain-of-custody process designed to support the NH Division of Forests and Lands in the investigation and prosecution of timber theft. In addition, the bill seeks to extend chain-of-custody requirements to the state carbon registry. The majority of the committee concluded that this bill provides the NH Division of Forests and Lands with essential tools needed to address violations related to timber theft. Furthermore, the committee determined that the amendment, by incorporating carbon-market tracking into the existing registry, would help safeguard New Hampshire’s natural resources from being sold or influenced by foreign adversaries. Vote 8-7.

Minority — INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE

Rep. Allison Knab

The issue of stolen lumber is a large problem in New Hampshire, with tens of thousands of dollars lost each year in timber theft. The original version of this bill would have required the origin of cut timber to be included on the scale slip, which 38 13 FEBRUARY 2026 HOUSE RECORD would assist the NH Division of Forests and Lands with identifying and prosecuting theft. The committee amendment added the tracking of carbon credits generated through carbon sequestered in New Hampshire trees to the legislation. While this might be worthy of discussion and consideration, the committee was unable to hold a hearing on this amendment and many questions and concerns were left unresolved. Tracking carbon credits is a complicated process and it is unclear how feasible it would be, how enforceable, and how expensive. Maine, for example, considered a similar model and determined tracking ownership would be too costly to implement. Further, this more appropriately should be vetted through the Carbon Sequestration Programs Study Commission, which was established last year through HB 123 to study issues around carbon sequestration. There is also a two-year moratorium on new carbon sequestration in the state, so the minority of the committee does not believe this legislation needed to be rushed through.

Hearings and recordings

Recordings are the General Court’s own, on YouTube. Start times are estimates unless stated otherwise, and the player opens early.

Page generated 2026-09-03 from data published by the New Hampshire General Court. Granite Record is an independent project, not affiliated with the General Court. The official record always takes precedence. Corrections: [email protected]