All bills

HB 1717-FN

relative to the jurisdiction of the circuit court, family division.

Filed 2026 · Killed · Children and Family Law · Courts and Procedure

Official record at gencourt.state.nh.us ↗

Open this bill in the searchable view →  ·  Follow this bill by RSS

On the record

Quoted from the General Court bill status page, not worked out from the docket.

StatusHOUSE
In the HouseINEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE
Introduced1/7/2026
Floor date2/12/2026
LSR number3237
Local government impactno
Committee codeH37

Bill text (PDF) ↗

Where it stands

House: INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE

Every floor vote on this bill was a voice or division vote, so there is no record of how individual legislators voted.

A bill goes on the consent calendar when the committee vote was unanimous or nearly so, and any members who dissented did not object to placing it there. It then passes without floor debate. Ten members may file a petition to pull a bill off the consent calendar and have it debated and voted on separately.

Sponsors

Sabourin dit Choinière, Matt(R) Rock 30, Bernardy, JD(R) Rock 36, Comtois, Barbara(R) Belk 7, DeRoy, Susan(R) Straf 3, Kelley, Diane(R) Hills 32, Perez, Kristine(R) Rock 16, Potenza, Kelley(R) Straf 19, Sirois, Shane(R) Hills 32
Prime sponsor in bold. From the General Court sponsor file.

What happened

Every action recorded in the official docket, in order. Each line ends with the journal or calendar that recorded it; where we have the document, that citation links to it.

Votes

Roll call tallies and individual votes from the General Court roll call files. Presiding, excused and absent are shown separately: one member presides over each House roll call and does not vote except to break a tie.

Inexpedient to Legislate

February 12, 2026 · House · None–None, adopted

Decided on a voice vote. Only the outcome was recorded — there is no count of how any member voted.

Committee reports

Reproduced from the House Calendar in the committee’s own words.

Committee — INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE

Rep. Mark Pearson

When this bill was presented to the committee, we were told that it was offered in case no other bills regarding family court would be filed. In fact, two new bills were presented and one from last year was returned to us for additional work. Questions regarding family court will be discussed when we take up those bills. Additionally, several questions were posed at the hearing regarding various parts of this bill, but no one offered any explanation or answered. For these reasons, the committee recommends that the bill be found Inexpedient to Legislate. Vote 15-0.

Hearings and recordings

Recordings are the General Court’s own, on YouTube. Start times are estimates unless stated otherwise, and the player opens early.

Page generated 2026-09-03 from data published by the New Hampshire General Court. Granite Record is an independent project, not affiliated with the General Court. The official record always takes precedence. Corrections: [email protected]