All bills

HB 1612-FN

relative to the use of price-fixing websites, algorithms, or other software by landlords.

Filed 2026 · Died on the table · Housing · Property - Real and Personal

Official record at gencourt.state.nh.us ↗

Open this bill in the searchable view →  ·  Follow this bill by RSS

On the record

Quoted from the General Court bill status page, not worked out from the docket.

StatusHOUSE
In the HouseDIED ON THE TABLE
Introduced1/7/2026
Floor date2/5/2026
LSR number2609
Local government impactno
Committee codeH64

Bill text (PDF) ↗

Where it stands

House: DIED ON THE TABLE

Every floor vote on this bill was a voice or division vote, so there is no record of how individual legislators voted.

The bill was set aside during the session and never taken back up, so it died when the session ended.

Sponsors

Read, Ellen(D) Rock 10, Hegner, Karen(D) Hills 41, Paige, David(D) Carr 1, Wheeler, Jonah(D) Hills 33
Prime sponsor in bold. From the General Court sponsor file.

What happened

Every action recorded in the official docket, in order. Each line ends with the journal or calendar that recorded it; where we have the document, that citation links to it.

Votes

Roll call tallies and individual votes from the General Court roll call files. Presiding, excused and absent are shown separately: one member presides over each House roll call and does not vote except to break a tie.

Lay HB1612 on Table (Rep. Alexander Jr.)

February 5, 2026 · House · 198–147, adopted

Decided on a division vote. Only the outcome was recorded — there is no count of how any member voted.

Committee reports

Reproduced from the House Calendar in the committee’s own words.

Majority — INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE

Rep. Joe Alexander

The majority of the committee believes this bill needs to be found Inexpedient to Legislate. On top of this bill being unclear about what constitutes pricing algorithms and software, this bill would also be redundant. The committee heard testimony that housing providers using a Microsoft excel formula could possibly be construed as “price fixing.” The committee also heard testimony that this bill is not needed as there is already a remedy for those who feel aggrieved by perceived monopolistic tendencies by our housing providers. The majority does not believe this bill would solve anything and would actually open up your mom and pop housing providers to defending a number of complaints regarding price fixing. Adding additional burdens to our housing providers will drive up rental costs and exacerbate our housing shortage. Vote 10-8.

Minority — OUGHT TO PASS

Rep. David Paige

Software should not be used to coordinate rents in ways that drive up housing costs for families. A recent analysis by the White House Council of Economic Advisors found that rental price algorithms increase rents by roughly $70 per month and cost renters nationwide billions of dollars each year. While price fixing has long been illegal, our statutes were written for a different era—before modern algorithms could quietly replicate the same behavior at scale. States such as California, New York, and Connecticut have already updated their antitrust laws in the last year to respond to this reality, and New Hampshire should not fall behind. Clarifying that these practices are unlawful helps protect renters, promote fairness, and ensure competition works for people, not against them, in today’s housing market.

Hearings and recordings

Recordings are the General Court’s own, on YouTube. Start times are estimates unless stated otherwise, and the player opens early.

Page generated 2026-09-03 from data published by the New Hampshire General Court. Granite Record is an independent project, not affiliated with the General Court. The official record always takes precedence. Corrections: [email protected]