All bills

HB 1589-FN

establishing the digital choice act.

Filed 2026 · Killed · Commerce and Consumer Affairs · Property - Real and Personal

Official record at gencourt.state.nh.us ↗

Open this bill in the searchable view →  ·  Follow this bill by RSS

On the record

Quoted from the General Court bill status page, not worked out from the docket.

StatusHOUSE
In the HouseINEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE
Introduced1/7/2026
Floor date2/19/2026
LSR number2907
Local government impactno
Committee codeH43

Bill text (PDF) ↗

Where it stands

House: INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE

Every floor vote on this bill was a voice or division vote, so there is no record of how individual legislators voted.

A bill goes on the consent calendar when the committee vote was unanimous or nearly so, and any members who dissented did not object to placing it there. It then passes without floor debate. Ten members may file a petition to pull a bill off the consent calendar and have it debated and voted on separately.

Sponsors

Litchfield, Melissa(R) Rock 32, Granger, Michael(R) Straf 2, Moffett, Michael(R) Merr 4, Thibault, James(R) Merr 25
Prime sponsor in bold. From the General Court sponsor file.

What happened

Every action recorded in the official docket, in order. Each line ends with the journal or calendar that recorded it; where we have the document, that citation links to it.

Votes

Roll call tallies and individual votes from the General Court roll call files. Presiding, excused and absent are shown separately: one member presides over each House roll call and does not vote except to break a tie.

Inexpedient to Legislate

February 19, 2026 · House · None–None, adopted

Decided on a voice vote. Only the outcome was recorded — there is no count of how any member voted.

Committee reports

Reproduced from the House Calendar in the committee’s own words.

Committee — INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE

Rep. Keith Ammon

This bill would establish a Digital Choice Act giving individuals control over personal data held by social media platforms, including the right to delete data and data portability requirements. Violations would be subject to penalties under RSA 358-A:2. Opposition testimony raised concerns that mandating open interfaces could create cybersecurity vulnerabilities and enable third-party data harvesting. Constitutional issues were identified, including First Amendment compelled speech and Dormant Commerce Clause conflicts. Major platforms already offer voluntary data deletion and download options. The committee recommends this bill as Inexpedient to Legislate due to constitutional vulnerabilities and enforcement challenges with out-of-state platforms. Vote 16-0.

Hearings and recordings

Recordings are the General Court’s own, on YouTube. Start times are estimates unless stated otherwise, and the player opens early.

Page generated 2026-09-03 from data published by the New Hampshire General Court. Granite Record is an independent project, not affiliated with the General Court. The official record always takes precedence. Corrections: [email protected]