All bills

HB 1567

relative to the valuation of telecommunications use of public rights-of-way.

Filed 2026 · Killed · Science, Technology and Energy · Energy and Utilities

Official record at gencourt.state.nh.us ↗

Open this bill in the searchable view →  ·  Follow this bill by RSS

On the record

Quoted from the General Court bill status page, not worked out from the docket.

StatusHOUSE
In the HouseINEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE
Introduced1/7/2026
Floor date2/19/2026
LSR number2470
Local government impactno
Committee codeH24

Bill text (PDF) ↗

Where it stands

House: INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE

Every floor vote on this bill was a voice or division vote, so there is no record of how individual legislators voted.

A bill goes on the consent calendar when the committee vote was unanimous or nearly so, and any members who dissented did not object to placing it there. It then passes without floor debate. Ten members may file a petition to pull a bill off the consent calendar and have it debated and voted on separately.

Sponsors

Durkin, Sean(R) Coos 1, Davis, Arnold(R) Coos 2, Korzen, Lori(R) Coos 7, Tierney, James(R) Coos 1
Prime sponsor in bold. From the General Court sponsor file.

What happened

Every action recorded in the official docket, in order. Each line ends with the journal or calendar that recorded it; where we have the document, that citation links to it.

Votes

Roll call tallies and individual votes from the General Court roll call files. Presiding, excused and absent are shown separately: one member presides over each House roll call and does not vote except to break a tie.

Inexpedient to Legislate

February 19, 2026 · House · None–None, adopted

Decided on a voice vote. Only the outcome was recorded — there is no count of how any member voted.

Committee reports

Reproduced from the House Calendar in the committee’s own words.

Committee — INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE

Rep. Michael Vose

The past decade has seen several contentious disputes over how to assess utility property for tax purposes. All these past disputes required an assembly of stakeholders into a study commission to hash out an acceptable assessment formula. This bill attempted to place such a formula into statute without engaging other stakeholders, which would be a prescription for lawsuits that would cost cellular telephone users and internet subscribers rate increases to cover potentially substantial legal fees. The committee felt that this process needs a more deliberative and collaborative approach that the bill did not provide. Vote 17-0.

Hearings and recordings

Recordings are the General Court’s own, on YouTube. Start times are estimates unless stated otherwise, and the player opens early.

Page generated 2026-09-03 from data published by the New Hampshire General Court. Granite Record is an independent project, not affiliated with the General Court. The official record always takes precedence. Corrections: [email protected]