All bills

HB 1508-FN

permitting one-party consent for audio and video recordings in certain instances.

Filed 2026 · Killed · Judiciary · Right to Know

Official record at gencourt.state.nh.us ↗

Open this bill in the searchable view →  ·  Follow this bill by RSS

On the record

Quoted from the General Court bill status page, not worked out from the docket.

StatusHOUSE
In the HouseINEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE
Introduced1/7/2026
Floor date2/5/2026
LSR number2525
Local government impactno
Committee codeH10

Bill text (PDF) ↗

Where it stands

House: INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE

Every floor vote on this bill was a voice or division vote, so there is no record of how individual legislators voted.

A bill goes on the consent calendar when the committee vote was unanimous or nearly so, and any members who dissented did not object to placing it there. It then passes without floor debate. Ten members may file a petition to pull a bill off the consent calendar and have it debated and voted on separately.

Sponsors

Barton, Joseph(R) Graf 1, Beaulier, Calvin(R) Graf 1, Kuttab, Katelyn(R) Rock 17, McFarlane, Donald(R) Graf 18, Thibault, James(R) Merr 25
Prime sponsor in bold. From the General Court sponsor file.

What happened

Every action recorded in the official docket, in order. Each line ends with the journal or calendar that recorded it; where we have the document, that citation links to it.

Votes

Roll call tallies and individual votes from the General Court roll call files. Presiding, excused and absent are shown separately: one member presides over each House roll call and does not vote except to break a tie.

Inexpedient to Legislate

February 5, 2026 · House · None–None, adopted

Decided on a voice vote. Only the outcome was recorded — there is no count of how any member voted.

Committee reports

Reproduced from the House Calendar in the committee’s own words.

Committee — INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE

Rep. Kristine Perez

It is the opinion of the majority of the committee that recording an individual without their consent could easily open the door to multiple inappropriate or harmful uses of such acts. For example, recordings could be used to obtain information that one might otherwise not divulge, to incite an emotional response in an individual in order to solicit a specific reaction, or for future uses by the recorder. The committee did not feel that this bill would adequately balance an individual’s right to privacy with the interests of the public and therefore determined that it was not in the best interest of the public. Vote 15-1.

Hearings and recordings

Recordings are the General Court’s own, on YouTube. Start times are estimates unless stated otherwise, and the player opens early.

Page generated 2026-09-03 from data published by the New Hampshire General Court. Granite Record is an independent project, not affiliated with the General Court. The official record always takes precedence. Corrections: [email protected]