All bills

HB 1294-FN

relative to speed regulation on Route 125 in Brentwood.

Filed 2026 · Killed · Transportation · Transportation and Highways

Official record at gencourt.state.nh.us ↗

Open this bill in the searchable view →  ·  Follow this bill by RSS

On the record

Quoted from the General Court bill status page, not worked out from the docket.

StatusHOUSE
In the HouseINEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE
Introduced1/7/2026
Floor date3/5/2026
LSR number2822
Local government impactno
Committee codeH27

Bill text (PDF) ↗

Where it stands

House: INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE

Every floor vote on this bill was a voice or division vote, so there is no record of how individual legislators voted.

A bill goes on the consent calendar when the committee vote was unanimous or nearly so, and any members who dissented did not object to placing it there. It then passes without floor debate. Ten members may file a petition to pull a bill off the consent calendar and have it debated and voted on separately.

Sponsors

Litchfield, Melissa(R) Rock 32, DeVito, Sayra(R) Rock 8, Gannon, Bill(R) Rock 23, Miner, Laurence(R) Rock 7, Weyler, Kenneth(R) Rock 14
Prime sponsor in bold. From the General Court sponsor file.

What happened

Every action recorded in the official docket, in order. Each line ends with the journal or calendar that recorded it; where we have the document, that citation links to it.

Votes

Roll call tallies and individual votes from the General Court roll call files. Presiding, excused and absent are shown separately: one member presides over each House roll call and does not vote except to break a tie.

Inexpedient to Legislate

March 5, 2026 · House · None–None, adopted

Decided on a voice vote. Only the outcome was recorded — there is no count of how any member voted.

Committee reports

Reproduced from the House Calendar in the committee’s own words.

Committee — INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE

Rep. Matthew Coker

This bill would reduce the speed limit from 55 mph to 45 mph on the portion of Route 125 in the town of Brentwood between the Epping town line and the Kingston town line. While the bill is well intentioned, the committee believes that lowering the speed limit on this stretch of road could lead to unintended consequences and may not achieve the goal of reducing traffic speeds. The Department of Transportation (DOT) testified that driving speeds are influenced more by road design than by the posted speed limit. As a result, reducing the limit could create increased traffic conflicts between drivers who continue to travel at speeds consistent with the road’s design and those who comply with the new, lower limit. Additionally, the DOT stated that its scientific study of this roadway did not support lowering the speed limit. Vote 15-0.

Hearings and recordings

Recordings are the General Court’s own, on YouTube. Start times are estimates unless stated otherwise, and the player opens early.

Page generated 2026-09-03 from data published by the New Hampshire General Court. Granite Record is an independent project, not affiliated with the General Court. The official record always takes precedence. Corrections: [email protected]