All bills

HB 1154-FN

restricting the texting of unsolicited advertisements, including political campaigns.

Filed 2026 · Referred for interim study · Commerce and Consumer Affairs · Elections

Official record at gencourt.state.nh.us ↗

Open this bill in the searchable view →  ·  Follow this bill by RSS

On the record

Quoted from the General Court bill status page, not worked out from the docket.

StatusHOUSE
In the HouseINTERIM STUDY
Introduced1/7/2026
Floor date2/19/2026
LSR number2623
Local government impactno
Committee codeH43

Bill text (PDF) ↗

Where it stands

House: INTERIM STUDY

Every floor vote on this bill was a voice or division vote, so there is no record of how individual legislators voted.

A bill goes on the consent calendar when the committee vote was unanimous or nearly so, and any members who dissented did not object to placing it there. It then passes without floor debate. Ten members may file a petition to pull a bill off the consent calendar and have it debated and voted on separately.

In practice this often ends a bill's progress for the term.

Sponsors

Thomas, Wendy(D) Hills 12, Boyd, Bill(R) Hills 12, Rung, Rosemarie(D) Hills 12
Prime sponsor in bold. From the General Court sponsor file.

What happened

Every action recorded in the official docket, in order. Each line ends with the journal or calendar that recorded it; where we have the document, that citation links to it.

Votes

Roll call tallies and individual votes from the General Court roll call files. Presiding, excused and absent are shown separately: one member presides over each House roll call and does not vote except to break a tie.

Refer for Interim Study

February 19, 2026 · House · None–None, adopted

Decided on a voice vote. Only the outcome was recorded — there is no count of how any member voted.

Committee reports

Reproduced from the House Calendar in the committee’s own words.

Committee — REFER FOR INTERIM STUDY

Rep. Keith Ammon

This bill would amend RSA 644:4 to restrict unsolicited text messages, including political campaign communications, by requiring prior express permission. Civil penalties range from $250 to $2,000 per incident, with enhanced penalties for repeated conduct and a required cost-free opt-out mechanism. The committee identified significant obstacles, including enforcement challenges posed by out-of-state senders and spoofers, burdensome consent record requirements, and First Amendment concerns about political speech regulation. Members noted that existing smartphone tools, such as number blocking and spam filtering, already address nuisance texts and continue to improve. Vote 16-0.

Hearings and recordings

Recordings are the General Court’s own, on YouTube. Start times are estimates unless stated otherwise, and the player opens early.

Page generated 2026-09-03 from data published by the New Hampshire General Court. Granite Record is an independent project, not affiliated with the General Court. The official record always takes precedence. Corrections: [email protected]