All bills

HB 1003

prohibiting the Grafton county attorney from engaging in the private practice of law.

Filed 2026 · Signed into law · Municipal and County Government · Counties

Official record at gencourt.state.nh.us ↗

Open this bill in the searchable view →  ·  Follow this bill by RSS

On the record

Quoted from the General Court bill status page, not worked out from the docket.

StatusSIGNED BY GOVERNOR
In the HousePASSED/ADOPTED
In the SenatePASSED/ADOPTED
Introduced1/7/2026
Floor date2/5/2026
LSR number2285
Chapter0117
Local government impactno
Committee codeH18

Bill text (PDF) ↗

Where it stands

House: PASSED/ADOPTED · Senate: PASSED/ADOPTED

Every floor vote on this bill was a voice or division vote, so there is no record of how individual legislators voted.

A bill goes on the consent calendar when the committee vote was unanimous or nearly so, and any members who dissented did not object to placing it there. It then passes without floor debate. Ten members may file a petition to pull a bill off the consent calendar and have it debated and voted on separately.

Sponsors

McFarlane, Donald(R) Graf 18, Barton, Joseph(R) Graf 1, Berezhny, Lex(R) Graf 11, Bjelobrk, Marie Louise(R) Graf 5, Franz, Linda(R) Graf 6, Guthrie, Joseph(R) Rock 15, Lynn, Bob(R) Rock 17, Pauer, Diane(R) Hills 36, Sellers, John(R) Graf 10, Ulery, Jordan(R) Hills 13
Prime sponsor in bold. From the General Court sponsor file.

What happened

Every action recorded in the official docket, in order. Each line ends with the journal or calendar that recorded it; where we have the document, that citation links to it.

Votes

Roll call tallies and individual votes from the General Court roll call files. Presiding, excused and absent are shown separately: one member presides over each House roll call and does not vote except to break a tie.

Ought to Pass

February 5, 2026 · House · None–None, adopted

Decided on a voice vote. Only the outcome was recorded — there is no count of how any member voted.

Ought to Pass

April 23, 2026 · Senate · None–None, adopted

Decided on a voice vote. Only the outcome was recorded — there is no count of how any member voted.

Committee reports

Reproduced from the House Calendar in the committee’s own words.

Committee — OUGHT TO PASS

Rep. Deborah Aylward

The committee heard testimony that county attorneys serve in a full-time, quasi-judicial and prosecutorial role that demands independence, impartiality, and the avoidance of conflicts of interest, both actual and perceived. This bill addresses concerns that allowing a sitting county attorney to engage in private legal practice may undermine public confidence in the fairness of prosecutorial decision-making, create divided professional loyalties, and complicate ethical compliance under the Rules of Professional Conduct. The committee noted that current New Hampshire law already prohibits county attorneys from engaging in the private practice of law in six of the state’s ten counties, and that at least one additional county restricts private practice in criminal matters. This bill therefore does not establish a novel policy but rather extends an existing and well-established standard of professional separation to Grafton County. Testimony from the prime sponsor emphasized that the bill is intended to promote consistency across counties, strengthen ethical safeguards, and ensure that the office of county attorney re10 5 JANUARY 2026 HOUSE RECORD mains focused exclusively on the public interest. The committee agreed that these objectives are reasonable, narrowly tailored, and aligned with longstanding legislative practice in New Hampshire. Accordingly, the committee finds that this bill advances transparency, uniformity, and public trust in county-level prosecution and recommends that the bill be found Ought to Pass. Vote 14-0.

Hearings and recordings

Recordings are the General Court’s own, on YouTube. Start times are estimates unless stated otherwise, and the player opens early.

Page generated 2026-09-03 from data published by the New Hampshire General Court. Granite Record is an independent project, not affiliated with the General Court. The official record always takes precedence. Corrections: [email protected]